Mutual fund manager Fidelity Investments yesterday settled allegations that more than a dozen of its current and former employees, including star executive Peter Lynch, accepted such perks as sports tickets, tropical vacations and a $160,000 bachelor party from brokers seeking to win business.
By taking Super Bowl tickets and trips to Bermuda,
Fidelity traders and supervisors broke rules that bar mutual fund
executives from allowing money or personal ties to influence their
investment decisions, authorities said.
Under a rule known as "best execution," fund officials are supposed
to consider, first and foremost, the best options available for their
clients when they decide where to steer stock trades.
Fidelity, which did not admit or deny wrongdoing as part of the settlement, agreed to pay the Securities and Exchange Commission $8 million to resolve the case. The Boston
fund giant also said it would turn over more than $42 million plus
interest to funds that may have been affected by the improper
gratuities, which occurred between January 2002 and October 2004.
Fidelity's board of trustees will meet later this month to approve a
payment formula, a spokeswoman said.
Three high-ranking executives with longstanding ties to Fidelity,
including investment guru Lynch, settled with lawyers in the SEC's
Boston office without admitting misconduct. Lynch, a television
personality and author of investment books who managed the company's
popular Magellan Fund for years before stepping aside in 1990, will
hand over nearly $20,000 in penalties and interest for collecting
tickets to see the rock band U2 as well as Ryder Cup golf tournament passes.
"I never intended to do anything inappropriate, and I regret having
made those requests," Lynch said in an e-mailed statement. His
spokesman said that Lynch, who now devotes the majority of his time to
charity, did not place or supervise any trades during the period in
Eleven current and former Fidelity workers who allegedly pocketed
lavish gifts are fighting the regulatory allegations. Among them are
Scott E. DeSano, who received travel and gifts valued at $145,000 from
brokers soliciting his business, the SEC said. DeSano led the global
equity trading unit before his departure from Fidelity last summer.
Another former Fidelity trader, Thomas H. Bruderman, received a three-day Miami
bachelor party that featured female entertainers whom one attendee
suspected were prostitutes, as well as a bag filled with ecstasy pills
that brokers provided, according to the SEC order.
In their filing, regulators cited e-mail messages the Fidelity
employees and supervisors exchanged with unnamed brokers. "Our
friendship is boundless," one broker wrote to a Fidelity trading desk
employee in March 2003. "Now, if you would please think of me next time
a big situation appears on your desk, our friendship would be to the
Lawyers for the men declined comment or did not return phone calls yesterday.
The case broke into public view after inspectors at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
uncovered evidence of possible wrongdoing during a routine visit to the
Jefferies brokerage. Jefferies, which employed the brokers who made the
Fidelity payments, settled a related case in December 2006.
"It's a hazard to fund shareholders when a money management firm
allows Super Bowl tickets and private jet trips to influence
decisions," said Sandy Bailey, an assistant regional director at the
SEC's Boston office.
Fidelity said it had heightened oversight of its traders and added
training to prevent future lapses. "Although the order makes no finding
of financial harm to our shareholders or our funds, we do recognize the
seriousness of the misconduct found by the SEC," the company said in a
But in a report commissioned by Fidelity Funds' independent trustees
and released yesterday along with the settlement papers, retired
federal Judge John S. Martin Jr.
concluded that "more than logic suggests that there is a substantial
possibility that the receipt of travel, entertainment, gifts and
gratuities by Fidelity traders resulted in execution harm to the
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.