Financial giants such as
Merrill Lynch and Citigroup among others are under fire from
environmental groups and some investors who complain they still fund
power plants and other polluting projects despite adopting the
Earth-friendly Equator Principles with much fanfare in 2003.
Under these principles, lenders promise to rein in
unsustainable development in emerging markets, such as logging in rain
forests and strip mining. So far, though, green groups say there is
little evidence the policies make any difference.
"Banks are making all the right sounds, adopting the
principles and putting them on Web sites," said Michelle Chan- Fishel,
who tracks green investing for Friends of the Earth. "At the same time,
they're financing really controversial transactions."
TXU Corp. of Dallas sparked the latest battle when it
announced an US$11 billion plan to build 11 coal-burning power plants
in Texas. Yet Merrill Lynch and Co. Inc. , Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
-- three banks that have embraced the Equator Principles -- are leading
the debt and stock transaction.
Last month, Rainforest Action Network launched a
campaign to pull the plug on the TXU plants, which would generate 78
million tons a year of carbon dioxide, by pressuring dozens of banks to
refuse funding and appealing directly to bank chiefs.
A TXU spokeswoman said the plants in the long run will
lead to improved air quality in Texas and supply the state's growing
power demands. TXU has committed to offset the new emissions by
installing carbon-capture technology as it becomes available.
Several banks are backing development of an open pit
metals mine in the Philippines's Rapu Rapu island, which Banktrack
contends will generate pollution that would threaten the livelihood of
thousands of farmers and fishermen.
"Common sense says this project is not compliant with
sustainability," said Johan Frijns, Banktrack's Amsterdam-based
coordinator. "We're going to make it very clear to banks that financing
coal plants is not acceptable."
Environmentalists say the principles themselves are
wanting, since they address project finance, not corporate debt, and
only in developing countries. The pact also does not address greenhouse
gasses thought to be linked to global warming.
Bank officials contend they have made progress reducing
their own energy and paper consumption and improving the real- world
impact of projects they back. Banks also plan to invest billions of
dollars in renewable energy and green technology.
Citigroup, Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase
& Co. , for example, have policies that go beyond the Equator
Principles by targeting greenhouse gasses. Bank officials also insist
they help make projects less harmful by working with clients and on
some occasions turning proposals down.
"The Equator Principles provide a framework to properly
look at environmental and social risks in project finance
transactions," said Shawn Miller, Citi's environmental and social risk
management director. "We will only invest in transactions that comply
fully with the principles."
Still US banks find they must also contend with
increasingly vocal investors who lobby for sustainable development and
from those who want banks to protect themselves from possible credit
and legal risks down the road.
"We'll be seeking meetings with banks to further
understand their due diligence and decision-making process for deals
like these," said Dan Bakal, director of power plant programs CERES, a
coalition of "socially responsible" investors.
But a dearth of information from Equator banks has green
groups seeing red. Environment advocates and some investors complain
banks do not share enough data so outsiders can determine if green
policies are being honored.
"They all need to step up on disclosure," said Julie
Tanner, corporate advocacy coordinator at Christian Brothers Investment
Services. "If nothing changes, you start to question the principles. If
things have changed, tell us and help us have confidence."
- 183 Environment